Overview

DIVISION OF PROTEIN TECHNOLOGY

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

8.5

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

90.3 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

92.7 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 90.3%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

DIVISION OF PROTEIN TECHNOLOGY

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 2.4 3 4.7 1.8 5.0 5.1 4.7 26.7 92.1% 0.9
Article, other 0.3 NA 1.1 0.2 0.8 1.1 0.5 4.1 100.0% 0.0
Conference paper, peer review NA NA NA NA 0.4 NA 0.6 1.0 40.2% 1.0
Conference paper, other 0.7 NA 0.2 0.9 0.2 NA 0.9 2.9 0.0% 0.2
Chapter in book 0.3 NA NA NA 0.8 NA 0.8 1.9 0.0% 0.6
Doctoral thesis NA NA 1.0 NA 2.0 NA 1.0 4.0 0.0% 0.0
Patent NA 1 0.5 1.0 NA 0.5 NA 3.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 13 15 13 7 14 17 19 98 94.9% 1
Article, other 2 NA 2 1 3 4 2 14 100.0% 0
Conference paper, peer review NA NA NA NA 1 NA 2 3 33.3% 1
Conference paper, other 1 NA 1 2 1 NA 2 7 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 1 NA NA NA 2 NA 1 4 0.0% 1
Doctoral thesis NA NA 1 NA 2 NA 1 4 0.0% 0
Patent NA 1 1 1 NA 1 NA 4 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

DIVISION OF PROTEIN TECHNOLOGY

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 1.4 7.9 5.5 0.3 23.3%
2015 2.8 103.2 36.8 0.0 0.0%
2016 3.5 21.9 6.3 0.3 9.6%
2017 1.8 55.0 30.5 0.2 13.9%
2018 4.9 23.0 4.7 0.4 8.1%
Total 14.4 211.0 14.6 1.3 9.1%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 7.7 3.42 0.5 6.4%
2015-2017 8.1 3.92 0.9 10.6%
2016-2018 9.8 1.39 0.6 6.3%
2017-2019 11.4 1.23 0.8 6.7%
Total 19.1 2.11 1.3 6.6%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 58.8%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 33 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 90.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

DIVISION OF PROTEIN TECHNOLOGY

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 7.7 1.34 2.7 34.8%
2015-2017 8.1 1.71 4.0 49.1%
2016-2018 9.8 2.00 6.0 61.7%
2017-2019 11.4 1.92 7.2 63.3%
2018-2020 13.7 1.67 7.3 53.5%
Total 23.2 1.64 11.6 49.9%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 33 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 90.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

DIVISION OF PROTEIN TECHNOLOGY

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 35 5 14.3% 18 51.4%
2015-2017 31 6 19.4% 17 54.8%
2016-2018 31 5 16.1% 14 45.2%
2017-2019 37 8 21.6% 19 51.4%
2018-2020 47 11 23.4% 24 51.1%
Total 89 19 21.3% 46 51.7%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 31 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 94%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Denmark 15 7 7 1 0 3.1
United Kingdom 10 3 7 0 0 2.0
India 8 4 4 0 0 1.4
Russian Federation 5 1 4 0 0 1.2
United States 9 3 5 1 0 1.2
Germany 4 2 2 0 0 0.8
Netherlands 4 1 3 0 0 0.7
Belgium 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Canada 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Norway 6 1 5 0 0 0.5
Singapore 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.4
Spain 5 2 3 0 0 0.4
Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Korea, Republic of 3 1 2 0 0 0.3
France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Japan 3 1 2 0 0 0.3
Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.3
Czech Republic 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
China 2 0 2 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Uppsala University University Sweden 42 25 16 1 0 7.7
Technical University of Denmark (DTU) University Denmark 15 7 7 1 0 3.1
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 14 6 7 1 0 2.4
AstraZeneca Company United Kingdom 8 2 6 0 0 1.8
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences University Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 1.5
Lund University University Sweden 9 3 6 0 0 1.3
Indian Institutes of Technology University India 4 4 0 0 0 1.2
Affibody AB Company Sweden 3 2 1 0 0 0.8
Stockholm University University Sweden 4 2 2 0 0 0.7
Tomsk Polytechnic University University Russian Federation 3 1 2 0 0 0.7
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 6 1 4 1 0 0.7
Spiber Technology AB NA Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
AstraZeneca Company Sweden 3 1 2 0 0 0.6
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden Institute Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Albanova University Centre University Other Sweden 4 3 1 0 0 0.6
Russian Academy of Sciences Other Public Russian Federation 2 0 2 0 0 0.5
BAM Institute Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Groningen University Netherlands 3 1 2 0 0 0.5
Kymab NA United Kingdom 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Inventia AB Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
Nanyang Technological University University Singapore 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
Linnaeus University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
ACIB Austrian Ctr Ind Biotechnol NA Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.4
Sobi AB Company Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.4
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna University Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.4
BioGaia AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Melbourne University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Toronto University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 4 0 3 1 0 0.3
KEYW Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
SP Group Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of California, San Diego University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Paris-Sud 11 University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) Other Public United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Erasmus MC NA Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.3
Res Tomsk Polytech Univ University Russian Federation 1 0 1 0 0 0.3
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.3
Syncona Investment Ltd Company United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.3
AdBIOPRO Competence Ctr Adv BioProd Continuous P NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Catholic University of Leuven University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Competence Ctr Adv Bioprod Continuous Proc NA Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
GammaDelta Therapeut Ltd NA United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Hasselt University University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Palacky University University Czech Republic 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Spiber AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Antwerp University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Wallenberg Ctr Prot Res WCPR NA Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
University of Bergen University Norway 4 0 4 0 0 0.2
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston University United States 4 0 4 0 0 0.2
Atlas Antibodies AB Company Sweden 2 0 2 0 0 0.2
Ctr Adv Bioprod Continuous Proc AdBIOPRO NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Free University of Brussels University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Immunovia AB NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology University Korea, Republic of 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
VIB Institute Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Aalto University University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Karolinska University Hospital University Hospital Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPERs) Institute India 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of British Columbia University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Maryland, Baltimore University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Tokyo University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of York University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
VTT Technical Research Centre Institute Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences University India 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Salamanca University Spain 3 0 3 0 0 0.2
Skåne University Hospital University Hospital Sweden 3 0 3 0 0 0.2
Sahlgrenska University Hospital University Hospital Sweden 1 0 0 1 0 0.2
Stanford University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.2
Barentzymes AS Company Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Danderyds sjukhus Other health services Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University Hospital North Norway University Hospital Norway 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Tromsø University Norway 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Clinnovo Research Labs Company India 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
FUDAN UNIVERSITY University China 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Tokyo Medical and Dental University University Japan 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Lab Surgpath Other health services India 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Attana AB Company Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Hosp GU Gregorio Maranon Other health services Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG) Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Univ Hosp Gregorio Maranon University Hospital Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Northwestern University University United States 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Institute United States 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
AbClon Inc Company Korea, Republic of 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
NimbleGen Systems GmbH Company Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Roche Holding AG Company United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Seoul National University University Korea, Republic of 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Dortmund University of Technology University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Cambridge University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Cellutech Company Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
New York University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Arizona State University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Northeastern University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of California, Santa Cruz University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Michigan University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Yonsei University University Korea, Republic of 1 0 1 0 0 0.0

Open Access

DIVISION OF PROTEIN TECHNOLOGY

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 13 6 1 3 2 0 7 46.2%
2015 14 8 5 1 1 1 6 57.1%
2016 12 4 2 1 0 1 8 33.3%
2017 7 3 1 1 0 1 4 42.9%
2018 17 8 1 3 3 1 9 47.1%
2019 17 13 5 5 2 1 4 76.5%
2020 19 18 10 7 1 0 1 94.7%
Total 99 60 25 21 9 5 39 60.6%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

DIVISION OF PROTEIN TECHNOLOGY

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 2.1 63.4 30.3 0.3 15.9%
2015 2.8 444.4 158.5 0.0 0.0%
2016 3.5 48.5 14.0 0.0 0.0%
2017 2.3 137.4 59.7 0.5 21.7%
2018 4.9 39.4 8.0 0.4 8.1%
2019 5.1 25.4 5.0 0.7 13.9%
2020 5.3 21.7 4.1 1.8 33.0%
Total 26.0 780.3 30.0 3.7 14.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with moderate Scopus coverage (at least 72.5%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 8.4 2.65 0.3 3.9%
2015-2017 8.1 3.44 0.7 8.5%
2016-2018 10.2 1.53 0.5 4.7%
2017-2019 11.3 1.35 0.6 5.6%
Total 19.6 1.91 1.0 4.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 79.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 8.4 1.31 3.2 38.3%
2015-2017 8.1 1.59 4.4 54.1%
2016-2018 10.2 1.60 6.6 64.5%
2017-2019 11.8 1.65 8.8 74.5%
2018-2020 14.7 1.54 9.0 61.0%
Total 24.9 1.51 14.0 56.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 79.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 37 6 16.2% 19 51.4%
2015-2017 32 6 18.8% 17 53.1%
2016-2018 33 6 18.2% 14 42.4%
2017-2019 39 10 25.6% 19 48.7%
2018-2020 52 15 28.8% 25 48.1%
Total 97 22 22.7% 48 49.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 90.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row